Social networks rise, IPO, and crash like mayflies. Tech platforms burn bright and vanish with little more than a dead link and a VC grave marker.
But zines? Those messy, photocopied little monsters survive decades in backpacks, archives, and milk crates. Why? Because paper and ink seem to have a half-life that outlasts entire billion-dollar servers.
Platforms Are Empires, Zines Are Graffiti
Tech platforms are built on venture capital spreadsheets. They collapse the second the money dries up or a better algorithm eats their lunch.
Zines aren’t built to scale. They’re built to exist. Hand-stapled, poorly xeroxed, shoved into hands at shows — they don’t need servers. They’re graffiti on paper. Graffiti doesn’t need funding.
Fragile vs. Tangible
- Tech: Disappears when a billionaire gets bored.
- Zines: Live in shoeboxes, thrift stores, and anarchist libraries.
Your LiveJournal posts? Deleted.
Your MySpace band page? Gone.
That zine you made in 1998 about dumpster diving? Still sitting in a milk crate, waiting to infect someone new.
The Medium Is the Message (and the Time Capsule)
Zines are inherently future-proof because they don’t rely on anyone but the creator. No login, no platform migration, no API changes. Just paper, toner, and maybe a cigarette burn in the corner.
Meanwhile, tech platforms demand constant updates. They want growth, scale, ad dollars. Once the numbers sag, the servers go dark. Your memes dissolve into 404 errors.
Zines As Survivors
The difference is intent:
- Platforms want to dominate.
- Zines just want to exist.
Things built to dominate are fragile. Things built to exist are cockroach-strong.
🚨 AD BREAK
Final Thought
Why do zines outlive tech platforms? Because they were never meant to “succeed.” They’re too stubborn to vanish.
One is designed for quarterly reports.
The other is designed for forever.